749 / Prevention of critical events involving patients

AUSTRIA
Classification of the PSP
Type of Patient Safety Practice Not Evaluated
 
Clinical Practice (CP)
Related practices from PaSQ database
"Best fit" category of the reported practice
Other
Early warning There is no specified text here
Topic of the reported practice
Incident reporting and learning system
Aim and the benefit of the Patient Safety Practice
 
The aim oft he AUVA-CIRPS (Critical Incident Reporting & Prevention System).is to report critical incidents and to the prevention of critical incidents in the future. The benefit of CIRPS in the AUVA is that all involved employees are part of the solution-finding prozess.
Description of the Patient Safety Practice
 
CIRPS stands for "Critical Incident Reporting and Prevention System". It is a tool for detecting, reporting, analysis, and solution-oriented processing of adverse events and errors. The primary goal is to implement measures that minimize the risk of future occurrence of defects.
In the emergency hospitals and rehabilitation centers of the AUVA CIRPS is part of the risk and error management. This simple system allows all employees report hazards before something happens. A team of employees constitute the “Safety Board”. This “Safety Board” manages the messages of employees and develop multi-disciplinary solutions to avoid the occurrence of critical events and errors in the future.
Drawing on the knowledge and experience of the employees will be benefited, because they know as experts in health care most about potential risks to patients about it.
In addition, a feedback management system use the knowledge, the experience and the experiences of patients for continuous improvement of processes and the identification of potential hazards and sources of error availed. That's the theory!

AUVA has started in 2006 in the Emergency Hospital Graz with the operation of a Patient safety System CIRPS. Meanwhile CIRPS is introduced in all seven hospitals accident and four rehabilitation facilities. To date (10/2012) more than 900 messages of the employees have been discharged. It requires appropriate management structures and corporate culture to muster the courage to employees,to indicate hazards and critical events with a message. Since the avoidance of errors, injuries and associated pain for AUVA is the ultimate goal, the appropriate conditions have been implemented.
Through the user-friendly reporting process by which every employee can report a critical event, and the rapid implementation of the findings in the daily workflow CIRPS be developed into a nationally and internationally acclaimed success system.
The error detection and prevention system CIRPS differs from other fault management systems, among other systems, that anonymous reports is possible, but not as a condition of a message does. In the institutions of AUVA is a very good working environment based on trust. To recognize hazards and avoid through inter-professional working sustainably is an important objective of the workforce. Confidence in the system is reflected in the high proportion of non-anonymous messages from 78 percent in 2011. The advantage of not anonymous message is that with people who report critical situations, contact can be taken and the important circumstances of the event can be accurately analyzed. Often the problem is that is in the detail, which is hard to find without a detailed analysis and processing.
In health care facilities are always error happen but the AUVA ensures ago with CIRPS to possible errors and to identify sources of danger ahead and avoid errors by appropriate measures and to make it impossible.
Attachment of relevant written information and/or photos, as appropriate
There is no specified text here
There is no specified text here
There is no specified text here
There is no specified text here
Effectiveness of the Patient Safety Practice
 
Degree of implementation of reported practice
Yes, fully
Level of implementation of reported practice
Institution level
Specific and measurable outcome for the reported practice were defined
Yes
A baseline measurement before implementation of the reported practice was obtained
Not relevant
A measurement after full implementation of the reported practice was obtained
Yes
Evaluation of a "positive" effect of the reported practice on Patient Safety
The evaluation showed improvements in Patient Safety outcomes
Type of before-and after evaluation
Quantitative
Enclosure of a reference or attachment in case of published evaluation's results
There is no specified text here
There is no specified text here
Health care context where the Patient Safety Practices was implemented
 
Hospital
Transferability
 
Successful implementation of this Patient Safety Practice in other health care settings than above stated
Not known
Specification of implementation in another health care setting(s)
There is no specified text here
Successful implementation's level  of this Patient Safety Practice across settings
There is no specified text here
Involved health care staff
 
Physicians
Nurses
Health care assistants
Therapists
Social workers
Dieticians/ Nutritionists
Technical support / technician
Administrative support (secretary, clerk, receptionist etc.)
Environmental support (Housekeeping)
Clinical manager
Quality manager
No health care staff involved
Patient Involvement
 
Direct service user's involvement as integral part of this Patient Safety Practice
No
Specification of the service users or their representatives' involvement in the implementation of this Patient Safety Practice
There is no specified text here
Point of time in which service user or their reprasentatives' involvement takes place
There is no specified text here
Active seeking of service users' opinion, feedback, experience, etc. as integral part of this Patient Safety Practice
There is no specified text here
Short description of the service users' level of involvement
There is no specified text here
Public accessibility of information regarding this Patient Safety Practice to patients and citizens/service users
Yes
List of sources where public information is accessible
WWW; Intranet, etc
Implementation of the Patient Safety Practice
 
Existing collaboration with other countries or international organisations related to implementation of this Patient Safety Practice
Yes
Problems encountering in the implememntation course of this Patient Safety Practice like lack of motivation, no management support, etc.
No
List of the most prevelent difficulties encuntered during implementation of this Patient Safety Practice
There is no specified text here
List of the most prevalent drivers for a successful implemetation of this Patient Safety Practice
Strong knowledge in implementation
Use of any specific incentives to enhance motivation while implementing this Patient Safety Practice
No
Description of used incentives, if any.
There is no specified text here
Existence of support or approval by the clinical or hospital management or any other hihg level authority in the implementation process of this Patient Safety Practice
Yes
Costs of the Patient Safety Practices
 
Completion of cost calculation related to this Patient Safety Practice
No
Total number of person days required to implement this Patient Safety Practice
Clinical staff: There is no specified text here
External consultants: There is no specified text here
Support staff: There is no specified text here
Managerial staff: There is no specified text here
Others: There is no specified text here
Not relevant: There is no specified text here
Total number of person days required for training as preparation for implementation of this Patient Safety Practice
Clinical staff: There is no specified text here
External consultants: There is no specified text here
Support staff: There is no specified text here
Managerial staff: There is no specified text here
Others: There is no specified text here
Not relevant: There is no specified text here
Total cost in Euro of specific equipment (machines, software, communications supplies, etc.) needed to support implementation of this Patient Safety Practice
There is no specified text here
Associated cost with a work reduction or foregoing in order to deliver this Patient Safety Practice
There is no specified text here
Contact information
 
Name: Robert Hoge
Country: AUSTRIA
Organisation: AUVA
E-mail: robert.hoge@auva.at
Phone: There is no specified text here
Print
Top
izmit escort
usak escort elazig escort
vidio bokep
antep escort escort bayan